Jump to content

SERGI-

Adicto al E69
  • Posts

    3276
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SERGI-

  1. He empezado el primer viaje serio de exploración. Todavía no tengo un destino claro. Estoy avanzando por el brazo de la galaxia en el que está el Sol. De momento sigo "cerca", a unos 900 ly, pero analizando sistemas en busca de objetos estelares curiosos o relativamente poco comunes.

  2. Llevo jugando con él desde su salida. Aunque no tengo mucho tiempo, la verdad. De momento hago de todo un poco con mi Adder tuneada. Exploración, caza recompensas y comercio. Mi objetivo es ahorrar para Un Así y lanzarme a la exploración hasta donde ningún humano haya estado antes... ;-)

  3. Hey, estoy empezando otra vez este tremendo juego y me estoy viendo desbordado por la cantidad de mods que hay ¿Sabéis de algun mod o conjunto de mods que sea imprescindible?

     

    También deciros que tengo mala experiencia con esto ya que hace tiempo me instale unos cuantos mods y el juego dejó de tener estabilidad y me petaba cada dos por tres...

     

    Y el tipo de mods...pues la verdad es que no sé, de cualquier tipo, a ver qué me pueden aconsejar los grandes frikazos que hay por estos lares. :icon_mrgreen::icon_mrgreen::icon_mrgreen:

     

    En esta página (imprescindible) puedes instalarlos con un gestor de mods que te permite actualizarlos a nuevas versiones. tiene un TOP100 donde vienen algunos imprescindibles. Algunos mods gráficos mejoran y mucho el juego, pero necesitas una buena máquina para meter resoluciones en HD

     

    http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/?

  4. No recuerdo si ya ha salido, pero no he conseguido encontrarlo con el buscador. Por si acaso os lo pongo porque me ha gustado el vídeo de la explicación.

     

    Esto es lo que ocurrió en 2007 con un vuelo de China Airlines. Un incendio con la posterior destrucción de 737. Afortunadamente con solo 4 heridos

     

    http://lessonslearned.faa.gov/ChinaAirlines120/ChinaAirlines120_Evacuation_pop_up.htm

     

     

    Y esta es la explicación de lo que ocurrió y de como una sola arandela (o su falta), provocó la destrucción de un avión y estuvo a punto de provocar una tragedia

     

    http://lessonslearned.faa.gov/ChinaAirlines120/ChinaAirlines120_Downstop_pop_up.htm

     

    Simplemente impresionante.

  5. Porque me llamo Paco.... :icon_mrgreen:

     

    No en serio, viene porque me han llamado Sergi durante mucho tiempo, aunque realmente me llamo Sergio y soy madrileño, pero tengo apellido catalán. El guión viene porque hace muuuucho tiempo en un foro me quise inscribir como SERGI y no me dejó porque estaba cogido. Así que añadí un caracter más. El guión. Y así se ha quedado.

  6. La aeronáutica militar va a cambiar radicalmente en los próximos 30 años y todo el mundo va a tener que cambiar la mentalidad.

     

    http://theaviationist.com/2013/09/06/nobody-wants-to-fly-drones/?fb_source=pubv1#.Uim3gj-DiMM

     

    The U.S. Air Force faces a personnel crisis when it comes to the drone pilots.


    In a report published for the Brookings Institution think tank, Air Force Colonel Bradley Hoagland said UAV recruitment offices does not get a sufficient number of volunteers.


    Back in 2008 only 3% of flying crew were related to drones. Last year
    the number reached 8,5%. Still more are needed because the sorties is
    on the rise.


    The UAV fleet of the USAF constitutes of 152 Predators, 96 Reapers and 23 Global Hawks HALE airframes.


    But there is little request for drones assignments and the amount the
    rate of drone pilots resigning or retiring is 3 times higher than that
    recorded among pilots flying traditional aircraft.


    Speaking of the report it lists out several factors that might have an influence on the problems present in the USAF.


    Firstly, it is the resignation rate.


    Secondly, the drones are flown more and more intensely, as it is a totally new technology which undergoes intense development.


    Thirdly the profession does not offer sufficient career opportunities.


    Last but not least a factor is also that drone pilots do not get the historical recognition, as it is the UAV, not its operator in Nevada, that gets the recognition for achieving given success in the battlefield.


    Back in the February, Pentagon created a new Distinguished Warfare Medal, specifically for the drone pilots or cyber warfare specialists.


    It did not last long. The medal was scrapped after veteran groups protested about its being to high a distinction.


    Col. Hoagland also believes that the recruitment process could be made better. In his interview with NBC news he said:


    The thrill of taking off from a runway, flying a

    mission and then coming back and landing at the end of the mission —

    that’s very exciting, but I think that’s a different type of person who

    can do that, than someone who is maybe wired to fly an unmanned system

    from a console 7,000 miles away. It’s a different psychological makeup

    requirement to execute the mission.


    The USAF psychological researchers still struggle to define what the right stuff
    for a drone pilot is. There is a detailed psychological report
    available, addressing the issue of psychological profile of a drone
    pilot. It is available here.


    The report lists several factors that are characteristic traits for the drone operators.


    Firstly, they posses visualy oriented cognitive setup. In other words their visual intelligence, according to the Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences model is developed the most, together with auditory intelligence, as the sound is also a crucial factor when piloting a drone.


    The second feature is that they are field independent, therefore they
    are able to multitask and focus for a long time, processing the data
    quickly and without any distractions.


    In other words, a drone pilot should be team oriented, whereas a
    typical fighter pilot is rather aggressive and depends on his own
    decisions.Nevertheless it is most certain that the recruitment process
    for the drone operators must be reviewed and changed, because despite
    the differences the USAF psychological screening procedures still
    remains the same for both kinds of service.


    Hoagland came up with some changes that were already suggested to the
    Pentagon. The USAF procedure of washing out is test called the Pilot Candidate Scoring Method.


    What is not said is that not all pilot candidates are given the
    exam, due to the fact that The Air Force Academy, for example started
    administering it, and only on an “experimental” basis, just recently.


    Hoagland claims that the standardized test would be a step ahead in
    selecting candidates for drone pilots, as the scores might be an
    indicator that would select some candidates for an F-16 and some for a
    drone. More importantly the psychomotor and psychological profiles of
    the candidate is not used in a selection problem.


    The tests just wash out people who are not capable of being a pilot,
    and do not have any influence on what kind of aircraft the candidate is
    going to fly.


    Let’s face it – drones are the future of the air warfare. Last September Gen. Mark Welsh said that “In the next 20-30 years these things are going to explode.” reffering to the drone programmes.


    The quote was used in the Wired report on the sequestration cuts in
    the drone program, as it will experience a cut of $866 million in 2014’s
    total budget of $1.3 billion for drone research.


    In the light of the abovementioned issues it is rather a personnel
    problem than a technology that will limit the drone operations in the
    USAF. It might be speculated that this will have an immense effect on
    development of the dromes that would fight and take decisions in an
    autonomous manner. This might also mean that a single pilot would not
    be assigned to a single drone, but to a swarm of the aircraft. And this
    is a completely unknown territory, at least in the pilot psychology
    dimension.


    On the other hand though, none of the reports addresses the moral
    issues of flying a drone, and dealing with the fact that the killing act
    is done from a safe, remote location somewhere in Nevada, something
    that has been discussed since the beginning of the Drone Revolution…


    Jacek Siminski for The Aviationist

  7. La mejora gráfica y de texturas es más que evidente. Efectivamente es un poco caro, pero el lavado de cara es bestial.
    ¿Qué no es el producto maravilloso que todos querríamos? Pues no. Tampoco lo han vendido como tal. A todos nos gustaría que sacasen un software donde hasta los baches de nuestra calle viniesen representados y con calidad fotográfica y que además de moviese a 100 fps, pero me temo que nos tendremos que conformar con lo que hay. FTX Global es un muy buen producto y si le sumamos la salida de los OpenLC que según parece nos mejorará el detalle del landclass, y si no mezclado con los UTX, nos deja un FSX más que aparente.

  8. He encontrado un enlace a este simulador a través de la Micromanía de este mes.
    http://www.beamng.com/content/

    Es un simulador automovilístico/físico en fase Alpha. Tiene un motor físico y sobre todo un motor de daños INCREIBLE. Desde luego tiene unas posibilidades enormes. Os dejo un video para que le echéis un ojo porque de verdad me ha impresionado.

     

     

    (Lo he puesto aquí porque no sabía en que apartado en el foro de simulación automovilística ponerlo. Srs administradores, ponedlo donde mejor consideréis)

  9.  

    Ayer jugando en el escenario de Iwo jima contra adversarios humanos, creo que batí mi record de dianas en una partida. 68 japos... :game:

    Es lo que tiene ir con una machine gun...108 yankis cayeron ayer en peleliu..... :cuniao:

    Dios que gusto dá cuando empiezan a salir de los edificios y ahi estás con la matraca...

    Yo sólo juego con fusil. Nada de ametralladoras ni sub fusiles.... ;)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Some pretty cookies are used in this website