shaeone Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Bien, al Airbus le hace falta que le metan caña, porque le faltan muchas cosas por simular. Cosas muy interesantes, como ésto del ECAM, pero también otros botones del OVH y del panel principal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 No me quiero hacer demasiadas ilusiones porque me dijeron que no iban a desarrollar un sistema de fallos aleatorios, pero a ver si han cambiado de opinion... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaeone Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 No creo que cambien respecto, al menos a corto plazo, aunque para mi no es lo más importante de un avión. Prefiero que tenga muchos botoncitos para tocar (dentro de los pocos que tiene el Airbus), que un motor de fallos aleatorio. Siempre puede animarse un desarrollador 3rd party. Saludos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Para mi es fundamental... sin ir mas lejos mientras leía tu mensaje ha empezado a pitar por overspeed debido a la meteo y he pegado un bote del asiento que para que... va a estar movido el aterrizaje en Tel Aviv... No se, perdidas de combustible, fallo de un motor en carrera de despegue, fallos hidraulicos, icing y un monton de cosas mas... para mi le daria mucha vida al addon y no te limitarias a despegar y aterrizar... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 No tiene muy buena calidad, pero… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaeone Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Sí, si estoy de acuerdo contigo, desde luego que los vuelos iban a ganar un poco más si de vez en cuando te salta un fallo en el pitot o cualquier historia. Los pequeños fallo de sensores son muy comunes en aviación, eso lo sabe cualquier hijo de vecino, y por eso llevan varios elementos que hacen lo mismo, para prevenir ésto, y eso es lo que yo echo en falta, un aviso que te diga que el pitot derecho está obstruido y que no da lectura de velocidad, o que hay una pequeña fuga de hidráulico en le tren. Pero fallos de motor, que no baje el tren o una descompresión de cabina no es precisamente algo que ocurra a menudo. Eso no me preocupa tanto, y por eso prefiero que funcione el boton de GND ON ND para mostrar el terreno, o el que hace que el EICAS aparezca en el ND, y no un fallo cada 2, 5 o 10 vuelos que me haga cantar por IVAO un mayday y tener que aterrizar en el aeropuerto más cercano. Eso está bien una vez, pero no siempre. El FSPassengers hacía bastante bien éste trabajo a mi parecer. Ahora solo podemos conformarnos con una señar de overspeed, de "ice detected" o de pérdida y, sinceramente, con los botones que no son funcionales, de poco sirven las checklist. Encender el Extended es un flujo de: baterias, luces NAV, ND, IRS, window heat, bombas de combustible, APU y motores. Y todo porque sabes que las baterias cargan correctamente, que el GPWS es funcional, que ni la APU ni los motores arderán, etc. Resumiendo, que un generador de fallos le da mucho valor, pero más le da tener todos los botoncitos funcionales, al menos para mi Saludos, y buena toma! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 (edited) Claro, es que un generador de fallos aleatorios sin los sistemas simulados… no vale de nada… Para mi el mejor generador de fallos aleatorios es el del Maddog 2010. Tiene tres apartados diferenciados, leves, graves y muy graves, de esa manera sabes que no vas a tener fallos motor en todos los vuelos (lo lógico es poner la barra de los muy graves en por ejemplo 1000 horas, que no significa un fallo cada 1000 horas) y que gestionando el fallo podrás llegar al aeropuerto de destino. La toma ha ido suave suave… Edited January 30, 2014 by RoteBaron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaeone Posted January 31, 2014 Report Share Posted January 31, 2014 Uff pues ahora me pillas descalzo respecto al Maddog, no recuerdo como iba el generador de fallos, pero bueno, sé lo que dices Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Aerosoft trabaja en el radar metereologico, por ahora lo veremos en el Airbus, pero parece que se podrá colocar en otros addons de Aerosoft. http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/78605-weather-radar-work-in-progress/ Making this a separate topic, even though this will first show in the A318/A3129. Shown here is the current status of our weather radar. For a long time I said (like many others) that a working weather radar was not possible in FSX. Well I was wrong. We found a way to access the data and what you see now matches the radar display. Even better, using the radar you can find rain. This works with FSX/P3d and with every weather add-on (or without weather add-on). The Images show that we can detect moving fronts, intensity etc. Some work is still needed to detect the tops of the rain clouds but the work is fully on schedule. What is NOT yet done is to make it look good. As you see the weather is created in square blocks in FSX, we need to smooth these out, probably combine it with some other data etc. We also need to look at effects like one front hiding the one behind it and things like that. The images however show a fully working weather radar in FSX. Cold fronts: Gray and rainy: Heavy rain ahead: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaeone Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Buena noticia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOSETI Posted February 15, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2014 (edited) En cuanto al Airbus X 320/321 de AS Tienen un nuevo ECAM entre manos. Algunos test. Y la nueva indicación del ATHR Otra Y la fecha de salida del A318/319 se dice, se comenta para verano de este año dejan atrás las previsiones de sacarlo en principios de año. El A330 hasta el 2015 imagino que no lo vemos. http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/69537-airbus-x-a318a319-preview/?p=560463 Un saludo. Edited February 15, 2014 by JOSETI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Una característica bastante desconocida del Airbus X Extended es el Flight Recorder. En la captura un vuelo desde el Aeropuerto de Ben Gurion en Tel Aviv al J. Hozman Airport de Eilat. En la imagen se ver que en la aproximación me colé cun poco e invadí el espacio aereo egipcio… Realmente me gusta este addon… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ce_zeta Posted February 17, 2014 Report Share Posted February 17, 2014 Buena captura! Si, es una pena que el registrador de datos de vuelo (FDR) no sea tan apreciado por la comunidad. Es un instrumento utilisimo para aprender y ademas, siempre es curioso ver la la ruta con los parámetros del vuelo en Google Earth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted February 19, 2014 Report Share Posted February 19, 2014 Cierto, es comparable al DFDR del Maddog 2010. Espero que sigan desarrollando este addon porque es muy interesante y de momento a falta de que se concrete algo de FSLabs, el mejor A320 para FS. Otra captura con más datos del vuelo… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOSETI Posted April 12, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2014 Andrew Wilson Root Admin 1888 posts Gender:Male Location:United Kingdom Posted Today, 09:04 AM Hi all - I had promised new screenshots - though it dawned on me shortly after this that we were fast approaching one of our internal release schedules (where a new build goes out to our technical/testing team), and I subsequently had to see to other tasks. Whilst such tasks inevitably bring the A320-X closer to your virtual hangers, it did mean that the promised new screenshots didn't show - so please accept my apologies. So, we're now in April 2014 - and the A320-X is nearing completion. It's a very exciting time for all of us at Flight Sim Labs - spurred on by the thought of completing the project after four years in the making. We've still got many very exciting features to share with you as the project enters the final stages of development, and we'll be revealing some of those once we get into beta - for now, here are some screenshots of the latest virtual cockpit model. And one last one, showing the latest livery to roll out of the paint shop: Sacado de su foro: http://forums.flightsimlabs.com/index.php?/topic/5229-new-vc-shots-april-14/ Un saludo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Parece que empiezan a preparan la salida de A318/319. Veremos a ver que sucede. http://pt.shop.aerosoft.com/eshop.php?action=article_detail&s_supplier_aid=12958&s_design=DEFAULT&shopfilter_category=Flight%20Simulation&s_language=portuguese Mientras, mas imagenes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted April 20, 2014 Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted May 4, 2014 Report Share Posted May 4, 2014 Primera imagen del A318/319 de Aerosoft Y mas de pantallas: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOSETI Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 BlackBox ha anunciado que también están con el A340... A340 "ADDITION"GUYS .. I am getting a little tired of answering this one.. so PLEASE Understand .. there is "NO NEW PRODUCT" and we are "NOT STARTING ON SOMETHING NEW"The A321 was added to the A320 series as they are very similar and the whole family uses (Almost) the same code .. The A340 is now being added to the A330 Family for exactly the same reasons.. IT IS NOT A NEW PRODUCT This additional "modelling" does NOT Take anything away from the systems or gauge improvements and upgrades we have Scheduled for the updates... BBS Consider these additional (FREE) models as Additional content to existing products and offers exceptional Value for money to our valued customers.We could have easily added the A340 as a separate product later and then charged our existing customers again for for using the same code base again and again like "A competitor" is doing where their customers are paying for a 320/321 and having to pay again for the 318/319 (when they finally turn up_ Oh and they haven't finished there A320 yet either .. Feature wise the so called V1.0 is only up to BBS V0.7 Level although it may be a little more Visually pleasing.. If that's what rocks your boat.And Finally we are not announcing an A380 , A350, A300, A310 or Beluga as these would indeed be "separate and totally new products"Guys .. This is NOT AVSIM.... Please be polite and think before trying to put our products and methods down.. We have MANY satisfied customers, Including ACTIVE TEST PILOTS EMPLOYED BY AIRBUS TOULOUSE ! If I may quote a couple ...... "I tell u once you are done this will be the reference for the years to come""very well done ... It was responsive as I expected , so far so good ... the Yoyo is almost fully on the numbers ... smooth vdev very minimal ... I am impressed"" there is no bus on sim level that can compete with yours.. Thats all I have to say to the matter"People .. we do know what we are doing ok ? Fuente: https://www.facebook.com/BlackBoxSimulation?fref=nf El mensaje es bastante claro, el A340 no lo tenemos que hacer desde 0 por que comparte código en su gran mayoría con el A330 y daremos el A340 free no como cierta compañía que ha sacado el A320/1 y ahora harán pasar por caja para el A318/9... Pone como ejemplo el echo de que en el A320 Prologue se tiene toda la familia y han añadido de forma gratuita el A321. Las ultimas frases son muy directas, sera verdad que es lo mejor de lo mejor? Entonces como tienen abiertos dos proyectos a la vez sin finalizar ninguno? (opinión personal mía) Un saludo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaeone Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Mi opinión: Blackbox sigue siendo PSS con otro nombre. Con esas palabras solo quieren hacer competencia, porque me parece que se les va a quedar grande cuando saquen el A330A340. Pero bueno, seguro que a esa compañía a la que se refieren le van a resbalar éstas palabras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Una cosa son la politicas de cada companyia, pero lo que esta claro es que el Extended es casi un pata negra y los productos de BlackBox son muy muy muy lights... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOSETI Posted May 23, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2014 Vamos a actualizar esto un poco!! Aerosoft y su A318/9, imagen de la nueva cabina que nos espera. Modelo exterior del A319 A380 de Next Level, nueva foto de su bicho. Next Level SimulationsMay 16 Not exactly one of the latest shots... but at least something to show the ND is still undergoing some very nice enhancements that are well worth waiting for this shot shows an UNFINISHED work in progress state! Fuente:https://www.facebook.com/pages/Next-Level-Simulations/181439575254200?hc_location=timeline Y ahora le toca el turno al A320 de Fslabs. Flight Sim Labs, Ltd.11 hours ago Hi all - I wrote earlier this week on our forum that we've been busy coding some low level systems functionality lately - such is the nature of the A320, there isn't a lot to show for most of the code that sits behind our simulation (you need to fly it to fully appreciate our efforts there). That said - we do have something we can show you this month. Those of you who studied our last set of screenshots pixel by pixel would have spotted that the weather radar panel on the pedestal was functional. Thanks to the fantastic work the guys at Hifi have done with ActiveSky Next (ASN), we have been able to simulate the Collins WXR-2100 for inclusion in our A320-X title. There's still some work to do on the A320-X before we consider it ready for testing, so for now - let me leave you with a quick teaser! Fuente: https://www.facebook.com/flightsimlabs?fref=nf Otro developer mas que sacara el WX con la ayuda de la gente de HiFi para su A320, veremos si esto retrasa mas el lanzamiento con que lo saquen este año contento estaré. Un saludo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoteBaron Posted May 23, 2014 Report Share Posted May 23, 2014 Por lo que tengo entendido las mejoras del A318 van a ser también implementadas en el A320 Extended, ¿no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOSETI Posted May 24, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Por lo que tengo entendido las mejoras del A318 van a ser también implementadas en el A320 Extended, ¿no? Así es, de echo las capturas de cabina en su inmensa mayoría eran del A320 ya que no tenían aun terminado el exterior del A318/9. Un saludo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 Mas del radar metereologico y de tierra el Airbus de Aerosoft http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/82081-airbus-projects-preview/page-23#entry593730 Time for some more wx radar images? We have put in a single big Cumulonimbus (default FSX weather) and we are at 7500 feet and want to know how big and dangerous that cloud is. Mmm looks serious. To find out how dense the cloud is we can reduce the gain. Clearly a rather dense rain core in that cloud! Let's see how high it goes by aiming the tilt up. That's the top of the cloud where there is hardly any rain. Not too high but I doubt we'll be able to climb above it. Besides, the nasty turbulence is always above these clouds. Let's see if it goes all the way to the ground, not that we want to dive under but it's a nice demo! Seems to go all the way down to the ground, note the return from the ground (ground clutter) in green. If we zoom in we might get a better picture. To isolate the cloud from the ground we can reduce the gain. There you see the wide 'foot' of this cloud, the area with densest rain. It's clear that this is a cloud to avoid! Let me close with a cool image of how you can use a weather radar for navigation. The beam is aimed down and we let is gather a few sweeps at medium gain. We get this display of the coastlines of Holland, Germany and Denmark. The sea is calm as there are no returns from waves. In case you do not recognise the coastline: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.