Silver_Dragon Posted April 4, 2013 Report Share Posted April 4, 2013 Venga, poco a poco vamos reflotando lo viejo. Video de prueba en DCS:W del T-2 BuckEye (la cabina no es la definitiva) http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1715739&postcount=82 So we promised DCS pics when we got something tangible, here it is, weapons on the T-2 Best regards Prowler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldcrow1975 Posted April 5, 2013 Report Share Posted April 5, 2013 ¿Que le pasa al HSI? Va al revés, incluso el de reserva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKULA_OPTIMUS Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 ¿El HSI o el horizonte artificial?, si es lo segundo yo lo veo bien, la parte clara el cielo y la oscura la tierra, de siempre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAFJFA F1 Team Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 No es los colores, es que está indicado el alabeo al reves. Saludos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKULA_OPTIMUS Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 Anda coño, si es verdad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amalahama Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 Si fuera un avión ruso, el comportamiento sería correcto... pues lo que indican es la actitud del avión, no la posición del horizonte. Saludos! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle_Katarn Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 Si fuera un avión ruso, el comportamiento sería correcto... pues lo que indican es la actitud del avión, no la posición del horizonte. Saludos! un horizonte artificial que no indica la posicion del horizonte Rusos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel101 Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 Si fuera un avión ruso, el comportamiento sería correcto... pues lo que indican es la actitud del avión, no la posición del horizonte. Saludos! un horizonte artificial que no indica la posicion del horizonte Rusos ¿entonces?¿los rusos llaman a ese instrumento la "actitud artificial" ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted April 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 hay que tener en cuenta que esa cabina ni es la definitiva y esta todo muy WIP, seguramente lo arreglen con el tiempo, yo tambien via algo que no encajaba con el horizonte xD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuanOscar Posted April 6, 2013 Report Share Posted April 6, 2013 Seguramente habran usado la funcion que viene por defecto, sin tener esto en cuenta. P.D.: El avion es feo de cojones... no me refiero al modelado, sino al avion en si... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldcrow1975 Posted April 9, 2013 Report Share Posted April 9, 2013 Si fuera un avión ruso, el comportamiento sería correcto... pues lo que indican es la actitud del avión, no la posición del horizonte. Saludos! Eso también se ve al revés en el vídeo, ya que marcaría la actitud hacia el lado contrario :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted April 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2013 Interesante comentario de RAZBAM a la acogida del T-2 BuckEye https://www.facebook.com/RazbamSims?ref=stream We are happy to see the DCS crowd reaction to our T-2 Buckeye DCS version. The T-2 Buckeye is anything but pretty, nor any of the high end rock and roll aircraft (yet it´s contribution to form countless numbers of naval aviators in USN and in former FAV and STILL keeps Greece pilots on their toes) but community reaction has been very positive.Thanks for that guys! y varias imagenes nuevas incluyendo pruebas con el HUD en cabina. https://www.facebook.com/RazbamSims?ref=stream Out for another round of testing missions, the load out is the same, not just because the aircraft itself is extremely limited on this matters, but also, because it gives us some flexibility on the weapons choice and the tests (next we´ll put the gun pods) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted April 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2013 http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1727030&postcount=99 Armament Panel test. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted May 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Prueba de armas en el T-2 Buckeye Razbam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted May 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2013 Mas imagenes del T-2 BuckEye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted May 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Today we were testing the armament panel logic and the airbrakes. Disclaimers: I am lousy at bombing. Animations are WIP, this is a logic test not an animation test. Yes, I was releasing from a too low altitude and I should have been smoked out of the air by my own bombs. Damage logic will be among the last stuff to go. The gunsight needs to be zeroed. Enjoy! ¿No hay algo raro en las bombas de racimo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirx Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Las animaciones de los frenos aerodinámicos son realmente pobres... creo que yo iré a por el L-39 (y el C-101, claro está) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAFJFA F1 Team Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Tal vez no son bombas de racimo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted May 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 La animación de los frenos es comprensible WIP pobreton total.... ni se ha molestado :P... pero las bombas o bien queria poner rockeyes porque tambien meter CBU-87????? y se ven que el impacto contra tierra son de racimo.... pero..... hay algo en la animación que no me cuadra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel101 Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Si, son de racimo y lo raro son los procedimientos. No se pueden lanzar de tan bajo esas bombas, apenas le da tiempo a abrirse y dispersar, de echo en el video todas las espoletas explotan en los mismos m2. Ademas, que si fuera de verdad a esa altura volaria tambien el avion por los aires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted May 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted June 3, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2013 CptSmiley, el creador del EFM para el F-16 se une a RAZBAM para crear el AFM del T-2 BuckEye http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=107700 Hi guys, I'm a big fan of communication and providing periodic updates to what's going on. I'm going to try to give updates of the air vehicle dynamics development of the T-2 on either a weekly or once every two week basis, it all depends on how fast things come together. In any event, I'll post those updates here. So for the first updates, I'll lay the ground work... (1) The T-2 will most certainly be AFM (2) The T-2 will be a great "stick and rudder" plane to learn on. I feel that combat and civilian pilots alike will enjoy this aircraft due to the "trainer" nature of it. (3) These "flight model" updates will include anything vehicle dynamics related (not cockpit, 3d model, or avionics subsystems) so I'll be happy to discuss anything related to the flight control systems, aerodynamics, landing gear systems, etc. I'm very excited to be working on this aircraft as there is plenty of data to work with and should be very fun to fly and I hope to give you guys a quality flight model along with the high quality the rest of the team is delivering (avionics, weapons, 3d cockpit and model). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted June 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2013 posteo esto como apunte....Se empieza a ver los primeros frutos de la contratación de CptSmiley por RAZBAM. Modelo de fuerzas aerodinamicas del T-2 BuckEye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted July 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2013 T-2 DCS Update. Mapping continues, hating life. Texture work started with the base colors and warning labels being done. Still have far to go with the harness, and parachute mesh. Happy Forth of July. Here is a quick WIP of the mapping of the pit, and a base placeholder texture being set. T-2 Buckeye DCS Initial Cockpit to Flight Model Interaction http://youtu.be/kroEkyzCMEs Video de prueba del modelo de colisión, Flaps y tren de aterrizaje http://youtu.be/6cRfIjNc6mc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted July 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2013 http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1808247&postcount=31 Here is what got knocked out: - Blended in the existing airfoil data tables with the very low/high alpha tables - Added in variable dynamic derivatives Both those above allow for nice stalls and I even got into some spins, need to read up on proper spin entry procedures for this guy and I'll compare and if it looks good, I'll have a video of that out. Also, Got the gear into a decent state, needed to use the A-10 collision model until ours gets tweaked just a tad. With all of those combined, and a ton of other tweaking, I'm able to test out how this guy behaves per proper takeoff/approach procedures. Here is a fun example: For my weight approach speed should be ~100 knots, angle of attack 15 degrees. My approach was 15 alpha but to be trimmed out I had to be a 115 knots so still a little work to do on it, but it is certainly getting there! Also, the gear modeling needs much work, it still has sissy USAF style gear strength as seen in the video. http://youtu.be/nISFEnJEzgg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.