Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sacado del discord de ED:



This law does not affect the development companies, but the collection of references. If the information was received not on the territory of the Russian Federation and not by Russian citizens, then the law is not applicable.

We do not plan to completely abandon the development of military equipment of the Russian Federation, but the laws impose obligations on us. That’s all. The law will still be supplemented and clarified, judging by the text.


Let’s see what will happen next. But don’t expect any serious systems, there won’t be any.


Y se acelera el desarrollo del MIG-29A




Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hasta que no implemente el Gangnam Style no lo compro....    

Creo que ser cocainómano goza de más reconocimiento social

Todo desde DCS. Tanto el panel de control de nvidia como el inspector no tienen efecto sobre DCS.   El PD es el nivel de densidad de pixeles para la VR. Como un SSAA para VR. Yo estoy proban

  • 2 weeks later...
27 minutes ago, Ce_zeta said:

El problema Typhoon es que hace falta que ED saque el S-200. Es la principal defensa de área Siria.  Tampoco tenemos Pantsir en DCS.


Cuando lo retiren quizá nos lo metan 😅



Tampoco tenemos F-22 entre otros...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

Important Information

Some pretty cookies are used in this website